In progress
A taxonomy of machine register
The measurable features that make writing read as machine-generated, at the lexical, syntactic, rhetorical, and pragmatic level.
Delv turns a fragment into the message you would have written. To this person. Not to everyone.
Read the research behind how we tell the difference.
Delv knows
Which is exactly why it stopped being worth anything. Every draft arrives well-formed, and readers have learned what well-formed and empty looks like. Sounding like a machine now costs you something measurable: replies you don't get, reviewers who stop reading, people who can tell you didn't write it.
Delv knows you
Delv knows them
How we got here
Delv started as a research tool. Then the entire category got commoditized overnight. What I learned building through that is what Delv is now.
2021
I was a research intern doing EEG analysis, spending most of my time just finding the right passages in a massive literature. So I built a synthesis engine on GPT-3 that could cut literature review time by 75%. Launched on Product Hunt on my fifteenth birthday, hit #3 product of the day. 20,000 people joined the waitlist.
2022
The premise of the company was that summarizing large text collections was hard and scarce. Within months, general-purpose LLMs made it neither. I watched the thing I built get commoditized from the inside.
2025
Cofounded Slashy, an AI-native email client (YC S25). Working on machine-drafted email in production taught me the real failure mode: the drafts didn't fail because they were badly written. They failed because they didn't sound like the person sending them.
Now
Both experiences pointed at the same thing. Once machine text became fluent and everywhere, fluency stopped being worth anything. What became scarce is voice. So Delv models the pair: how you write, and who you're writing to.
Delv beyond
There is currently no accepted way to measure whether a piece of text reads as a specific person writing to a specific person. Existing detectors work at the level of the document and don't attempt it. We're building that measurement in the open, because we need it before we can claim anything.
In progress
The measurable features that make writing read as machine-generated, at the lexical, syntactic, rhetorical, and pragmatic level.
Next
A public dataset and evaluation harness for writer-specific and recipient-specific fidelity. Usable by anyone, including people building against us.
Next
The only test that matters: can the actual recipient tell? Not a classifier. The person you sent it to.
"It's not that it wrote badly. It's that it wasn't me."